Cells: seat value in ETH at horizon · price multiple vs launch. Rows vary the share of contraction weeks, columns the net buying per expansion week, everything else as set. Bold cell is your case.
| Whitelist seats | |
| Public seats at the floor | |
| Public premium above the floor | |
| Team top-upnot announced | |
| Total ETH into the system | |
| Into the pool / into the vaults | |
| Whitelist allocated on 13 Sepmint page, more to be added at launch | 450 seats |
| Hard floor and ceiling from the mint1,000 × 0.15 and 1,000 × 1.25 | 150 to 1,250 ETH |
| Tax at your minute | |
| Effective cost per tokenspot ÷ (1 − tax) | |
| ETH to double the launch pricepool × (√2 − 1) | |
| ETH to 10xpool × (√10 − 1) | |
| Day one license band2 to 4 days of one branch's yield |
All five run on the system scenario above with your seat price. Worth = ETH realized + balance and wallet marked at spot. † charter burned. Bold row is your current settings.
The card renders from the system and strategy sliders. Download it, post it, and let people argue with the inputs instead of the conclusion. The link button copies a URL that reopens this exact case.
Three things are fixed by the team: the whitelist price (0.15 ETH, one per wallet), the public auction (every unclaimed seat, 1.25 ETH decaying to 0.15 over 30 minutes, first come first served) and the destination of mint proceeds (100% to initial liquidity and the protocol vaults, 0% to the team). The whitepaper fixes the shape of everything else but leaves the numbers blank: base issuance, epoch length, the multiplier's range and steps, the exit fee curve, the trading fee. So the model takes the whitepaper's mechanics literally and lets you set the blanks. Every slider is one blank.
Genesis liquidity is 100M $STANDARD locked full range in the Uniswap v4 pool, the only pre-mint. Full-range pricing means spot equals ETH in the pool divided by 100M, and with a 1B hard cap the launch FDV is exactly ten times the ETH in the pool. The pool is entirely protocol owned, so at the open the pool is the whole float and the FDV is a number, not a valuation.
Weeks run in cycles: an expansion run, then a contraction run, with the split you set. In an expansion week traders buy a set share of the pool's ETH; in a contraction week they sell. Swaps follow constant product, so price moves with the square of the pool's ETH growth. The policy multiplier steps up 0.125x per expansion week to a 2x ceiling and halves per contraction week to a 0.5x floor. Issuance = base rate × multiplier, streamed pro rata to branches as a ledger balance.
Each day up to 100 expansion licenses sell at your clearing price (in days of one branch's yield), paid from earned balances and burned, capped at 10 branches per charter. Each week bankers retire the share of balances you set. The resolution fee is quadratic in weekly exit pressure between an assumed 2% floor and 25% ceiling, saturating at 20% pressure. Half of every fee burns, half is paid back to balances that stayed. Withdrawn tokens are minted; the share you set is sold into the pool on top of trader flow, the rest sits in wallets as float.
Daily volume is a share of FDV. The $STANDARD side of the fee burns. The ETH side routes 70% to the active vault (expansion weeks: hard reserves, tokenized gold; contraction weeks: the buyback vault), 15% to permanent liquidity (added to the pool, which only ever grows) and 15% to the team. In contraction weeks the buyback vault buys and burns, rate limited to about a third of pool depth per week at launch settings. Mint ETH not sent to the pool starts in the vaults, half as reserves, half as buyback ammo.
The whitelist seat in the verdict never expands: one branch, earnings left at the bank, valued at spot. Payback is the first week its accrued balance is worth more than 0.15 ETH before any exit fee. The seat economics table reprices a license and a built-out ten-branch charter at the horizon's branch yield and price, the way the sister model at reservemoonmath.xyz does. Everything is mark to market on a pool you could not exit into at size; treat it as a valuation, not a cash flow.
The system tab decides price, issuance per branch, license prices and exit fees week by week. The Your bank tab runs one charter on top of that path: it earns its branches' share each week, spends its balance on licenses up to your target and pace (or buys the shortfall at spot if you allow it), and retires branches on your schedule, paying that week's system exit fee, selling the share you set and holding the rest. Nothing a single banker does feeds back into the system; at 1 of 1,000 seats that is a fair approximation.
Base issuance rate, epoch length, multiplier range and steps, exit fee floor and ceiling, trading fee, the pool versus vault split of mint proceeds, the team's own ETH, the final whitelist size (450 allocated on 13 Sep, more at launch), the anti-snipe decay curve, and the chain. The team said final parameters and contract addresses go public before launch.
| Launch thread | x.com/standard_rsv/status/2098969960404103353 · 13 Sep 2026 · mint details, schedule, anti-snipe tax, day one |
| Whitepaper v0.1 | standardreserve.xyz/whitepaper · cap, genesis POL, charters, branches, auctions, fees, vaults |
| Mint page | standardreserve.xyz mint page · 450 of 1,000 spots allocated on 13 Sep, whitelist price 0.15 ETH |
| Audits | x.com/standard_rsv/status/2098183945926119589 · two audits, zero critical findings, reports before launch |
| Sister model | reservemoonmath.xyz · the horizon valuation sandbox this page grew out of |